The perceived "perverseness" of the content is the power by which it is entertaining and felt to be wildly erotic. We personally see nothing inherently wrong with peeing, nor playing with pee in whatever fashion one desires, with or without additional sexual actions.
Ultimately the content on this site is fantasy fiction. It is read by those who wish to of their own freewill. We believe that everyone who takes part in reading it or in acting in any way associated with the content does so because they enjoy it thoroughly. If anyone does not, we believe they can easily choose to leave and ignore the material.
In regard to the legal test of measurement of "obscenity" of the site, we believe the applicable legal test is the "Miller test", which says that all three of the following must be true for content to be "legally obscene":
We believe that the content is actually relatively tame compared to much of what exists on the internet today. To start, there are no pictures on this site. All the content is text. Additionally, the content adheres to the idea that one can bring about intense sexual pleasure through the will of oneself and ones own actions. There need not be any "force" by another party. We believe that those who read and enjoy the content appreciate it greatly and learn from the experience to appreciate their body and its weird behavior during sexual activity.
As such, we are not appealing to the sick and twisted. We are appealing to the common person who has little understanding of their own sexuality, and providing erotic content to help such a person explore their sexuality without fear or condemnation.
As for the 2nd point of the miller test, we are not aware of any specific laws applicable to the content. There are cases of laws applying to specific sexual content, such as to bestiality, and scatological content. Both such topics are very dangerous to anyone involved with them, and we agree such topics are patently offensive. We do not believe this to be true of peeing combined with playful sexual actions.
For the 3rd point of the miller test, we believe that the content has serious literary, artistic, political, and scientific value.
The content is written carefully and has been revised over and over again to make it able to stand on its own as having literary value covering the intensity of peeing combined with sexual play. We don't know of any such other literary work that covers such ideas so thoroughly.
The content has artistic value in that it paints an ideal image of the wonder and wild weird pleasure of peeing combined with sexuality. Constantly through the work this ideal is described and elaborated on to give the reader a concept of it that is our own artistic view. Whether a single person agrees with the moral value of the art is irrelevant. It is artistic none the less and appeals to artistic concepts.
The content has political value in that it brings the issue of accepting peeing combined with sexuality as a healthy norm. While the image is an ideal as described, we do believe there is great political value in moving society as a whole to not shun the concept so much. There is much political debate to be had about the existence and acceptance of this content.
The content has scientific value in that it attempts to study exactly what conditions are able to bring about the female orgasm, and how to achieve the maximum intensity and length of such an orgasm. It has been carefully constructed to serve as a way to get statistical information on the effectiveness of various techniques.
In closing, we believe the content is beneficial to society and legal in every way. We have worked hard to find applicable law, and not found anything so far to contradict our belief.
Update: It has come to our attention that there is some applicable law in other national jurisdictions. The keywords to lookup for laws that may apply in your region are "urolagnia" and "urophilia". Recent obscenity laws in the U.K. notably have outlawed erotica of this variety. The content herein is not produced by U.K. citizens nor is it hosted on U.K. servers, so it is not a concern of ours.
We have not researched the legality of the content in depth outside of our own jurisdiction. If you are located in a country, region, or state where you have knowledge of legal issues surrounding the content, please submit feedback about it and we will be happy to provide that information to other visitors of the site.
Other laws that perhaps may be considered are those applying to minors. The contents of the site are not aimed at minors, and we have gone out of our way to make this as clear and evident as possible across the site. This is one of the reasons the pet name "daddy" is not used within the content. We do not wish to encourage children to consume this content or for the content to be especially appealing to them should they choose to illegally do so.
Other laws that some may point at as being relevant are those regarding "self harm". We don't believe any of the actions described in the content fall within such law, nor even that the described actions are in fact harmful. We deem harmful as "causing permanent pain or damage". If the actions were to be acted out, we could see that a variety of them could cause some pain and discomfort for some unknown short period of time. We don't believe temporary pain in order to have increased pleasure is "self harm" or falls within any legal description of "self harm". For some small selection of individual, we could envision that it's possible a person could somehow cause themselves harm from the content. This is the reason for the detailed warnings and clear explanation that the content is fantasy fiction and that the reader is responsible for whatever actions they engage in while reading the content. We do not wish for anyone to be harmed by the content. In the same way that violent movies do not endorse violent actions, by describing extreme methods of attaining sexual pleasure we also are not endorsing those actions. Any perceived approval of the actions of our readers is a misunderstanding; we encourage our readers to enjoy the content physically, not to engage specifically in acting out the described fiction.
Note that feedback comments are generally displayed as is. The contents of such comments
are not generated by the producers of this site nor do we believe we are legally responsible for their
specific content. Should a comment be deemed illegal in some fashion please contact us immediately through
the feedback and it will be removed promptly. This is the reason for the acceptance and post of the comment
containing "daddy" despite our intentional non-use of the term on the site.